Last year, one of my credit cards received a 60% credit line decrease (CLD). It is understandable as issuers reduce exposure on long-term inactive accounts all the time.
Then a few months later, I got multiple balance transfer offers on the same account.
Well, with the offered interest rate of only 2% vs 6% inflation, I decided to take it.
In a call with the customer service representative, I asked my line to be reinstated.
After 10 minutes talk with her supervisor, the agent advised me unfortunately the line increase request cannot be accommodated.
âYou can request again 6 months later.â
OK, no big deal.
After 2 months, I got a credit line increase (CLI) offer on the same account.
đŠ How do you think of the series of events?
Are the messages consistent to the customer?
Could the customer experience be better?
This is a classic example that credit strategies do not work in sync.
This happens often, especially with a large lender - because credit strategies are typically developed by different persons or teams.
In this case, there could well be 4 persons developing CLD, balance transfer, reactive CLI, and proactive CLI strategies separately.
đŠ How to eliminate the inconsistency between strategies?
đ Maintain a good inventory of strategy documents. Encourage strategy developers to get familiar with all strategies, even those not under current responsibilities.
đ Have a peer review process - so people managing different strategies have a chance to spot anything inconsistent.
đ Rotate staff through different decision areas so they become well-versed with the full life cycle of credit strategies.
The line increase offer?
I took it.
ComentĂĄrios